• stonedemoman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t realize people can’t do a 10 second google search on their own. 🙄

        Net income isn’t the whole story anyways, especially when this article points out that one of their costs is lobbying for a cause that isn’t necessary. They’re raking in billions of dollars every year.

        • kirklennon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t realize people can’t do a 10 second google search on their own.

          You specifically chose to quote a sentence about profit and then provide a number that is not profit. What was the point of commenting at all if the number you provided had no relevance?

          • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What was the point of commenting this instead of looking up their profit and posting that instead?

            Edit: They won’t answer that so I’ll answer it for them. These shills are trying to rip down my credibility to push a narrative even though the specific number they’re looking for also happens to be enormous.

            • ripcord@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not a shill as far as I know. What if I agree with them that it would have made more sense to mention profit #? Do I instantly become a “shill” too? If so, where can I get my check?