• stonedemoman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t realize people can’t do a 10 second google search on their own. 🙄

      Net income isn’t the whole story anyways, especially when this article points out that one of their costs is lobbying for a cause that isn’t necessary. They’re raking in billions of dollars every year.

      • kirklennon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t realize people can’t do a 10 second google search on their own.

        You specifically chose to quote a sentence about profit and then provide a number that is not profit. What was the point of commenting at all if the number you provided had no relevance?

        • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What was the point of commenting this instead of looking up their profit and posting that instead?

          Edit: They won’t answer that so I’ll answer it for them. These shills are trying to rip down my credibility to push a narrative even though the specific number they’re looking for also happens to be enormous.

          • ripcord@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not a shill as far as I know. What if I agree with them that it would have made more sense to mention profit #? Do I instantly become a “shill” too? If so, where can I get my check?