• Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I’m always skeptical when something is called privacy focused and the article lists no privacy features.

    Does this actually provide any new unique privacy features or is it something akin to arkenfox where it is just getting everything upstream from firefox?

    • RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 days ago

      Privacy wise it very much is still Firefox with different defaults (telemetry disabled, do not track enabled), the changes to upstream are mainly the UI and some performance enhancements

    • www-gem@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      When I first heard about Zen, I’ve tested it with EFF like I do for all web browsers I experiment with (from most mainstream to most unknown). Unfortunately, it doesn’t offer a full privacy.

      Not everyone cares, but if this is something important for you, Librewolf has been the only one to come up with a full privacy protection result. Maybe you could achieve a good result if you use Arkenfox with Firefox… I didn’t try it.

        • www-gem@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Some sites don’t load because of some features disabled in Librewolf. You can enable them and have the sites load, but it defeats the purpose of the Librewolf configuration choices. Nonetheless this is still an option :)

          • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            With the current browsers panorama, it’s important to use more than 1 browser. My main browser is Librewolf, then Brave for work, and Mullvad for all the rest. The reason being that almost every site is made to work first on Chrome and everything else is an afterthought (so I use Brave for those).