• Rob200@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Falkon browser isn’t a bad choice, there is no ad tracking, There’s block auto playing video function built in. All around a solid privacy respecting browser, compared to Firefox and Chrome.

    I abandoned Firefox for Falkon for the last 2 years and hadn’t regretted it.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Every single time someone mentions they abandoned firefox for something “better”, it’s chromium based. Privacy is good, but the most important for me is to avoid monopoly/monoculture.

      • Rob200@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I get it but, if it’s maintained by a different party then Google, even then there’s going to be some conflict of interest compared to Google’s Chrome and Brave’s Chrome for instance.

        But if you would rather use the ai features in Firefox, then have at it. Falkon doesn’t have any mention of ai in it’s settings or features. Nor does it have an ad network. Sometimes you got to look at more then just “it’s based on Cromium.”

          • Rob200@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Would you say Webkit would be a better browser engine, since Blink was based on Webkit and not the other way around?

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Falkon is based on QtWebEngine.
        So not Chromium although they may share renderer, but last I heard QtWebEngine was based on Webkit.

      • Rob200@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        It uses qtwebengine, but it does have it’s own ui (making it less like Chrome) and some of its ownfeatures.

        But which would you rather have an ai littered browser by default (Firefox), or use Blink.

        Considering it’s just a rendering engine, and that the browser has adblocking built in,doesn’t automatically scream to me privacy invading. Unlike in Google Chrome you can even auto clear your browser history on close. The browser itself isn’t based on Chromium, when it first launched it had a different rendering engine.

          • Rob200@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            When I first started using it it was using a different engine. If it’s using Chromium and it scares some of you, then don’t use it. But with Mozilla doing that they are doing now days with ai and ad networks, does it even make a difference now, between using Firefox and Chrome?

            • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              yes, they are not nearly on Googles level, not even comparably.

              Secondly it’s not even primarily about that, even if it made no difference, two competing shitty companies is better than a full on monopoly.

              I’m not coming from google hate, I just want there to be more than one actor, therefore I will never ever pick the largest one.

          • Rob200@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            If it keeps out the ai features in the latest updates and the ad networks, then that fork and some of the other Firefox forks might be a good option.

    • Grangle1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Falkon is better for privacy than stock Chrome or Firefox, but I still find Brave or LibreWolf better than that.

      • Peffse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I chucked Brave shortly after they decided to install a VPN service on my machine without consent or notification.

        A service that silently reinstalled itself on Brave update.

        A service that did not remove itself when you uninstall Brave. It took a lot of research and time to rip out the guts of that. I will never trust Brave again.

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I think brave should be disregarded as something safe and privacy respecting if they were willing to silently whitelist Facebook trackers in the past. Then there is their whole crypto obsession.

      • nyan@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Only problem is that you wouldn’t be able to visit most sites, because Mosaic only supports HTTP 1.0. You could go for Lynx, though. Just remember to disable the cookie support.