• vegeta@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    “ Tesla displayed its Optimus humanoid inside a clear box, motionless next to its cars.”

    • yopla@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      The idea is that there is untold trillions worth of existing infrastructure and tools that are designed to be operated by humanoids, so the hope is that by designing it close to a human form it will be able to perform task in an environment designed for human without having to design a different robot for each task.

      Basically the idea is to create a robot that is good enough at doing a lot of things instead of one that is super efficient at one thing like the ones we use in industry right now.

      There are a lot of use cases, but they all assume the robots reach a certain level of precision, speed and adaptability, which we are still far from.

      • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Honestly I find it really hard to imagine a humanoid robot (at least without muscle induced mobility) maintaining an aircraft/plumbing and so on.

        I can imagine the use case. I don’t see this tech being anywhere close to maturity in this decade though. The amount of processing power would be CRAZY to deal with these tasks, no? Computer vision + motor skills. Add actual mobility to that. What would be the power source? Definitely not a battery! Would it be like a cable connected to a wall outlet or something?

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Running cost of a robot is far lower than the running cost of a human.

        • Wanderer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          That’s a terrible idea.

          Are we meant to be taxing excel and automated telephone exchanges, what about the printing press or solar panels?

          All those have lower running costs than industries they replaced that had more workers.

  • HarriPotero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 days ago

    Why would they name their robot after the second best autobot?

    Everyone knows Ultra Magnus is the best one.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 days ago

      Dude I’d totally ride a C5 in 2024, that thing looks like it’s a perfect alternative to those scooters that are everywhere. At least now you could use lithium batteries and beefier motors instead of the garbage they had back then.

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        Dude I’d totally ride a C5 in 2024

        Just get a recumbent e-bike and slap some paneling around it.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        With all the SUVs out there these days, I’d be worried about riding anything that low to the ground in 2024.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Humanoid? The requirements were clear… maximize the number of guns. How many guns are required to pick apples from a tree? Well if you got 10 apples, surely 10 guns right?