Even if they have that permission, they can’t just turn on the microphone when you’re not in the app. Also the battery drain and data usage will be impossible to miss.
Even if they have that permission, they can’t just turn on the microphone when you’re not in the app. Also the battery drain and data usage will be impossible to miss.
I think they’re lying. Apps can’t access the microphone, on an OS level, without explicit permission from the user. Unpess Facebook found and used insane exploits in both Android and iOS, I’m calling bullshit. They’re just bragging about something they can’t possibly do.
What did these tools do? I don’t see any LLm being used for creating anything working from scratch, without the human propmter doing most of the heavy lifting.
If that’s true, how come there isn’t a single serious project written exclusively or mostly by an LLM? There isn’t a single library or remotely original application made with Claude or Gemini. Not one.
Then I’m not buying anything from them again.
Fascist piece of shit. I’d love to never hear anything about him again.
Wait, some people don’t know that??? It’s literally called “JavaScript Object Notation”.
Access to tech.
Name one complaint, other than blocking people with ad blockers. How has the actual product changed?
How is YouTube getting crappier for me as a paying customer? I feel like it hasn’t really changed in years.
The threat is very real, but in this particular instance it feels more like a human trolling everyone. It just doesn’t add up.
Ads are bad (I agree).
Paying for things is bad.
Then what’s left? YouTube should somehow be ad free and free of cost for the user forever and ever? Who’s gonna pay for the enormous costs of operating the service?
People are going to start yelling at me about capitalism and enshitiffication. Both of which cause problems, but what do you propose here? Magic?
I always thought Apple should make appliances. I say let them try.
I dunno, they could’ve kept some of it in-memory, it’s just a bunch of plaintext.
They do?
Why on earth aren’t they encrypting the database? It could have adressed much of the criticism but they just decided to leave the whole thing completely unprotected.
Why is he specifically a sex pest?
Apparently they’re going to address YouTube replacements in the second part of the series. Also I’m fairly sure they spoke about Youtube ReVanced a couple of times before.
Why would there be an automatic court case?
Why are you here if it’s so bad?