You can see a tweet, but not list of her tweets, iirc.
Your average Reddit escapee
You can see a tweet, but not list of her tweets, iirc.
Steer by wire is pretty much the only cool thing. It exists elsewhere sure, but not in vehicles of this size
Considering the length of your comment, you could have started by reading the article.
Being around someone who did search for something is enough (location, same wifi).
deleted by creator
Revanced with MicroG. I use YouTube 50/50 on mobile and Shield (SmartTube) and if my watch history, subscriptions etc. didn’t work, I wouldn’t be using it.
They aren’t better IF you enjoy most of YouTubes features. Usability is key, and messing around with Revanced manager twice a year has been worth it easily.
Being OS doesn’t suddenly make worse UX better.
Are you daft? You chose one fourth of the definition, dismissing the parts that made you sound like a retard. Im sick and tired of having to engange with autistic pricks like yourself. Fucking take a hint.
The part where your text wasn’t from a cited agreed upon source, but your own ass. God damn give it a rest and take your ADHD meds ffs.
You say you did, but you lie.
You continue defining yet more terms to avoid saying another. You do you, but that’s not how the world works
Your definition of piracy is not correct
But it is? Don’t lie to yourself. We all do it but it’s still piracy, and it’s okay.
It came with either Windows 2000 or XP.
Attacking Åland would be invading Finland, a NATO country. They wouldn’t dare.
More like: GIMP can do much of what PS can do, but you’ll tear out your hair trying to, cause it’s so unintuitive and slower.
No. another type of ML algorithm could, but not an LLM. They do not work like that.
The truth is, this is the perfect type of a comment that makes an LLM hallucinate. Sounds right, very confident, but completely full of bullshit. You can’t just throw money on every problem and get it solved fast. This is an inheret flaw that can only be solved by something else than a LLM and prompt voodoo.
They will always spout nonsense. No way around it, for now. A probabilistic neural network has zero, will always have zero, and cannot have anything but zero concept of fact - only stastisically probable result for a given prompt.
It’s a politician.
As a Finnish person I wholeheartedly agree with Linus.