Just a note, unless you have a very specific use-case you don’t want to do deduplication.
See:
Just a note, unless you have a very specific use-case you don’t want to do deduplication.
See:
Yes, and it saved my ass a few times. Every computer I own now and in the future will have at least mirrored or raidz disks with zfs. On all desktops, laptops, servers and nas.
Even upgrading from spinning rust to ssd was easy replacing the disks one by one and resilvering.
The (k)ubuntu installation made it very easy to have an encrypted zfs rootfs but they may have removed it on newer installation iso’s, I’m not sure…
Yes, and that is where we enter the complicated territories…
I’m sorry, but have you ever needed to manage some certificates for a legacy system or something that isn’t just a simple public facing webserver?
Automation becomes complicated very quickly. And you don’t want to give DNS mutation access to all those systems to renew with DNS-01.
We call that percussive maintenance… the brick is optional.
That’s good advice, we will. Thank you.
Thankfully Microsoft is a thrustworthy partner with the users best interests in mind. /s
At home Proxmox works reall well. When our VMWare licenses expire we’ll certainly evaluate that as option.
Wasn’t really aimed at you but from the things I’ve seen I am afraid not all Windows administrators might realize that.
And probably as a security update as well.
Installing Word, on a server, running as administrator, forecefully linked to some MS account for activation… Is that really a reasonable solution in a Microsoft world? Smh.
If documentation comes as Word document there is no documentation and a huge red flag for the software.
This is the best answer. I’ve been doing it for years at work. Dual-booting is just very inconvenient and WSL(2) is the worst of both worlds.
Install Linux on the machine and keep windows in a nice secure kvm-based cage where it can do less damage.
I’m sorry, you’re arguing in bad faith or have a huge case of Stockholm Syndrome.
But, just look at their Troubleshooting documentation where they tell you to drop to the terminal.
My point is that Microsoft has stopped making new buttons and dropdowns and refer you to new Powershell incantations for most new settings. Just look at how many options the new “Settings” app offers compared to the deprecated Control Panel.
Ha, then stay on Windows 7/10 or you’ll lose your control panel soon…
I have heard this argument for over 20 years… “You have to use the terminal in Linux, so user hostile”.
Well, try to do ANY windows sysadmin tasks without Powershell… See how far that gets you. Need to manage Exchange? Powershell. Need to change some network settings? Powershell… It is even getting more and more unavoidable. Now Powershell doesn’t even have a good terminal environment, sane parameters or good usability. And a general lack of documentation for all the obscure incantations.
In the meantime KDE on Linux is wonderful, fully integrated with the system, easy software maintenance (on Kubuntu for example) and with a sane settings menu… You hardly need a terminal at all. Try to find that in Windows.
So sorry, this argument is either invalid, out of date or Microsoft is even worse.
Strangly this UI always reminds me of the hospital scene from Idiocracy… Click the icon for where it hurts
As others have said: it depends on your technical expertise… But a nice and cheap solution is hosting a static blog build with Jekyll on Gitlab pages.
If you’re still interested it seems that they’ve uploaded the keynote, see link in my comment:
https://lemmy.deedium.nl/comment/115389
It seems they’ve uploaded the keynote, see:
Keynote: Linus Torvalds, Creator of Linux & Git, in Conversation with Dirk Hohndel
Don’t worry, also you will get a chance to learn… It’ll be fun!
That’s such a shame. ZFS has been rock solid for me for years while I hear lots of scary stories about btrfs.