Right, but AI is not the only way they’re doing the data collection.
Just chilling
Right, but AI is not the only way they’re doing the data collection.
It probably won’t be profitable in rural areas to begin with.
But not from a knowledge engine. It makes sense if some rando just spouted off a date from the top of their head but this is the former world leader in knowledge capture and search.
Fair enough! I definitely read this around the time 5g was coming around but apparently I was misinformed.
IIRC, 5g is a much nicer generation for the carriers than for consumers. It can be more easily deployed with microcells on light poles vs requiring the tall cell towers. There’s ultra-wideband, which is definitely faster, but plain 5g is roughly the same, just easier to roll out.
I microwaved my phone and the battery level hasn’t gone down at all since.
These situations are almost always self-inflicted. If someone else hacked Google Cloud this badly then you’d likely have heard it from them first. And they probably would have done something significantly more destructive if their goal was harming Google reputation.
Unprecedented only means there’s no precedent. This just hasn’t happened before at this scale.
But here, the API is open and I can run my own copy and train my own LLM same as anyone else. It’s not one asshole who decides to whom and for how much he’ll sell the content we all gave him for free, so he can justify his $193 million paycheck.
I’ve had exactly that in my personal slack space since OpenAI announced gpt3. He’s helpful and hilariously accurate.
Samsung will add extra AI so their next ad will be employees being crushed into single device.
Plus you have plenty of time to tumble once or twice while your large codebase compiles.
Yeah, this is pretty textbook selection bias.
I think the joke is that the AI trained on SO data to the point that duplicate, similar, or common questions would get this treatment. Since that’s common enough on SO to be a meme.
As an AI language model I’m not able to answer duplicate questions and this was asked before. Closing.
Something I have: my luggage
Something else I have: bolt cutters
It’s an expensive system but it works for me.
I’m not saying it doesn’t suck for this person, but product market fit is a thing for open source too. If people need it they’ll use it and contribute until something better comes along. If not, your idea wasn’t the one. That doesn’t mean it’s not possible. Nearly my whole life runs on open source software, so it’s pretty clearly sustainable.
over the years, using “open source” has become an excuse to avoid paying for software
Um. Yes. And to be blunt: obviously. And in return, I give away software I create for free whether people need it or not, and try to give back in the form of contributions too. But I’ve never once given up my day job for it. Would that be nice? Maybe. But open source software is more frequently sustained by passionate people using and expanding it for their own projects and not by expecting people to pay you for your efforts when you’re likely not paying (nodejs, github, ahem) for the software you’re building it on anyway.
The workplace, or at least career progression, is like 50% politics lol. Google is no different.
Can we joke about log4shell? Maybe heartbleed?
Better yet you can configure gitignore globally for git. I do this mostly to avoid polluting repo ignore files with my editor specific junk but *.key and similar can help prevent accidents.
https://git-scm.com/docs/gitignore