• 2 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle





  • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldStarting from zero
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Recommend doing a jellyfin server with an *arr stack! Prowlarr, radarr, sonarr, plus qbittorrent. Bonus if you can integrate i2p in there so you don’t have to rely on a VPN :)

    there’s also Nextcloud AIO docker. I use it to sync my photos and escape Apple’s 5gb max free-tier backup

    Maybe add some assorted services like an invidious instance, Searxng instance?

    Welcome to the self hosting rabbit hole!


  • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoProgrammer Humor@lemmy.ml:3{:3|:3&};:3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Replace “:” with “a” you get

    a() a a&; a

    Reformatting

    a() {

    a | a &

    };

    a

    So it creates a function, a, which what it does is it calls itself and pipes its output to itself (the a | a). The ampersand means that this will run entirely in the background. Then, to initiate things, the command calls a (in the last line)

    So, there will be exponentially be many recursive calls to a, which will eventually deplete your stack and set your pc on fire







  • Thank you for your comment, I think there’s a meaningful discussion to be had here. US “law” is meant to legitimize the ruling class and serve to protect their interests. In this case, copyright law, meant to legitimize the control of US media corporations on intellectual property, is actually hindering their reach and access to materials that can train their AI models. In any case, this is going against the spirit of what the law is made for, which is to protect corporations.

    Law isn’t made from a vacuum. Law is written by the ruling class passed and minted by the ruling class. I did not remember voting for any copyright law (the US is not a direct democracy), and therefore the law is imposed to us.

    So, you are correct, we are at a crossroads. More specifically, corporations are. Will they lobby to be an exception to copyright laws so they can continue training on copyrighted data, or will they weaken copyright laws enough so that their actions will be deemed legal?

    My take is that since their models are trained from copyrighted data made by the people, the access to their models and its predictions / inferences must also be made accessible to the people. Of course they will not do that, so they will fight the hardest to be able to train on the most amount of public data while giving the fruits of that data only to the paying customers. The classic “socialize the losses, privatize the gains” trick that capitalists use.

    anyway fuck capitalism fuck AI fuck this rant I’m high af




  • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPtoLinux@lemmy.mlenough said.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    LOL wait till the company your proprietary software relies on tanks or makes a shitty change for their benefit.

    It’s sad you built a career out of black box code lmao. I guess 20 years isn’t enough to read the writing on the wall: proprietary code is shit. Black boxes are shit. I piss on your profession


  • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPtoLinux@lemmy.mlenough said.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Is it that top of the line software truly doesn’t exist for linux, that it’s impossible to the work done, or is it possible BUT you have to spend more time tinkering and learning the quirks of quite admittedly rough around the edges open source software? That yes, it’s less efficient, but actually more rewarding knowing that the software you worked on was open source. And one you actually learn how to use open source software, nobody can take it away from you.

    Look at unity! They gutted the program through its egregious licensing structure and now people are scrambling for alternatives. People that sticked with Godot didn’t have the same trouble. It was just another Wednesday

    Of course open source can’t play on the same level as proprietary software right now. It doesn’t have the same money thrown at it than proprietary software! But the appeal of open source is that every change is guaranteed to benefit you, not some arbitrary bottom line. Proprietary software is polished, but you are at the whims of a big tech company.

    If i were to base my profession on software, spend literal years of my life depending on code, i really would fucking like to look inside that shit sometimes. Anything else is like building a skyscraper out of quicksand


  • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPtoLinux@lemmy.mlenough said.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    There is a trade off i guess if you put it that way. Would you rather tinker and make your software work for you, or would you install a shitty bloated operating system that routinely trades your data like pokemon cards just so you can install a handful of programs comfortably.

    Real change requires real change


  • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoLinux@lemmy.mlBased KDE 🗿
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    List of things to consider

    1. There are alternatives
    2. You can use wine
    3. You can run a windows VM and install it there
    4. Dual boot windows
    5. Microsoft has built a proprietary moat around their operating system. The reason why it’s hard to switch from Windows is by corporate design. A mix of early adoption, network effects, and just plain cold hard cash makes them dominate the operating system market. Of course it’s infeasible for your 60yo coworker to switch; but KDE presents an alternate reality, an opportunity, for people fed up with big tech’s bullshit. Yes, figure out how to run and use alternatives you fucking nut. Way to go disparaging countless volunteer hours spent on open source projects so that people like me can switch to linux.

    Comments like these make me irrationally angry. Why complain about open source software and give bad PR? It’s open source; contribute.