If the camera system + software results in being 1% safer than a human, and a given human can’t afford the lidar version, society is still better off with the human using the camera-based FSD than driving manually. Elon being a piece of shit doesn’t detract from this fact.

But, yes, a lot of “ifs” in there, and obviously he did this to cut costs or supply chain or blahblah

Lidar or other tech will be more relevant once we’ve raised the floor (everyone getting the additional safety over manual driving) and other FSDs become more mainstream (competition)

I wear many hats. You failed, BTW.

Explain your methodology for posting this post, including any edits made to the original post.

… or use Firefox and migrate their bookmarks.

Can we ban bot-posted articles with incomplete body text?

I prefer to reduce demand, instead. Everyday people who feel happy and safe don’t feel the need to be violent.

Just because it’s possible, doesn’t mean it’s common.

It’s hard to convince tech people to be activists. There’s this other term, in between bougie and proletariat that classifies the people in between. Something like, the people who have it just good enough to not give a shit.

And that’s like all of tech.

They’re not selling the copy, bruh. They’re selling a technology that very few understand. Smart people pretend they get it, but they don’t. That’s how rare the math is.

Whatever happened to copying isn’t stealing?

I think the crux of the conversation is whether or not the world is better with ChatGPT. I say yes. We can tackle the disinformation in another effort.

But that’s on the LLM side not the bot side.

Finally, people can enjoy cheese pizza in peace.

No alert development, threat hunting, or ML research? No upskilling of any kind? Must be nice to work at a company with no impact to the world when it gets popped.

You sound fun at (key signing) parties

Yea but you need the owner account to authorize the computer. So next time you upgrade or wipe your gaming rig you’d be screwed unless you find a bypass and if you’re working that hard, just have the password+mfa

If you have the PDFs of that, you can build it with two clicks in GCP

Are you saying Teslas are simple?

My Asus motherboard started bluescreening Windows. After a lot of effort I traced it down to a specific device ID that windows was loading firmware for. No matter what I tried I couldn’t get this auto installation to stop. It was a totally random component that added nothing I could tell.

Asus refused to release new firmware be cause the motherboard was “unsupported” even though the box etc has stickers saying it supports windows 10.

After a ton more effort I figured out how to make some low end api calls that eventually stopped this auto installation. It was mostly reliable. I got to crack a lot of jokes to my friends about my motherboard not supporting windows but it was a really hard period for me particularly because Linux gaming wasn’t as strong as it is today. I was really big into league of legends at the time and this experience forced me to quit, losing touch with many friends in the process.

She now supports its removal, and IMO that’s the only reason it should be taken down.

That’s a great question. No way to tell. It’s freaking emoji.

A thumbs down could be displeasure of the product not being able to catch it, or it could be them not liking the comment because they think it’s untrue.

A fuzzer might catch the crashes related to the memory layout? But its purpose is to look for vulns not malice.

The dude himself is legit tho, he probably owns OSS Fuzz

https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonathan-metzman-b8892688

https://security.googleblog.com/2021/03/fuzzing-java-in-oss-fuzz.html