Yes, making movies is not an easy feat. But there’s plenty of good stuff coming out. Don’t know what to tell you.

Hollywood has been sucking ass lately, but lots of small indie films have been kicking ass. Everything from A24 has been fantastic recently. Lots of good foreign films too

Take Sneako too pls

Would be nice if they made ‘dumb’ EVs. Like the kind where even the windows are manual old school roll up. I don’t need to walk into a spaceship to drive to get groceries. But all they’re selling are luxury spaceships. For all the good Tesla did to rebrand the market, I feel it also did a lot of harm by creating an incentive for luxury vehicles.

Does this mean I could install and run Blender on my phone???

Fairlight, which is part of Da Vinci Resolve, is pretty powerful. I don’t use Audacity because it’s mostly a destructive workflow.

That’s…no…that’s not how this works.

Am I missing something or is this the most vaguely written description? I don’t get it. Something biometric is all I got out of it

It’s not only car routes

This what I don’t understand. How can a chat app be this slow? Some serious brain rot in this apps development

I think Autodesk is working on one.

Shouldn’t it be sans serif though? Low effort.

Tan himself is pretty unhinged too

Yeah I agree, but with large platforms it’s inevitable for tastes to converge towards the median. A Rothko wouldn’t even register on such a platform.

I guess you’re right. I suppose this last phrase threw me off:

• i don’t need to take time to look at stuff people didn’t take time to make

The way I read it this statement stands apart from the rest of their comment. Skill is nice–I agree–but I stand by my original statement: time or effort does not by default result in an artistic product. I suppose I could have read it wrong in that the comment as a whole is a bit disjointed.

No. The person I replied to was exclusively praising skill and emphasizing its relevance to the final product. I pointed out that effort does not by default result in an original or creative product. OP dismisses effort and equates time with quality. Take for instance japanese calligraphy: the master places only a handful of strokes to render something gorgeous. On the other hand, someone could spend 80 hours meticulously recreating a photorealistic portrait in watercolor but it’s just a human xerox at that point. The human element is completely missed.

Respectfully disagree. There’s a plethora of artists with exceptional skills that create photorealistic art in several mediums. While the process takes an inordinate amount of time it is completely devoid of any creative input. These are essentially human xerox machines that match color values from a photo using the naked eye. The skill is impressive, the art: not so much.

Not a primary source. Also, every Wikipedia page posts the primary sources at the bottom. Wikipedia is just a compendium, it’s not a peer reviewed journal. Use some brain matter before it rots my dude.

Hate CinemaBlend. Just endless vapid Ai generated shit. Probably the same course for the rest.

Kid or troll. Hopefully kid. Has to be. There are so many imbeciles on this site it’s hard to tell sometimes though