What I’m reading here is that it is new for a browser to offer all those features. You’d need to do a bunch of customisation to reach a similar result otherwise. It’s fine that people don’t care about it, but that doesn’t make it less new.
What I’m reading here is that it is new for a browser to offer all those features. You’d need to do a bunch of customisation to reach a similar result otherwise. It’s fine that people don’t care about it, but that doesn’t make it less new.
I really like the vertical tabs, the split profiles, the quick notes and the mini windows for links from other applications. If there is a prior product with all these features I’d love to try it. Please send a link.
Inertia/convenience mostly. I needed a little bit of storage and already had ddos protection through them.
Oh, that’s neat. I just started moving things to Cloudflare, I’m curious how this compares in pricing mostly
It’s not, they’re not open sourcing their driver. They’ve made an open source driver.
Building an open source project is not just a technical challenge. It’s a social one as well, and politics are a big factor in that.
If you pay for their support, probably a lot b better than my cheap VPS.
To support E2EE in RCS?
I think you can set quotas, which could be 0. I have to say it’s been a while since I dove into the settings though.
But it doesn’t reference the whole movie, does it. It’s meant to invoke a memory of a specific character in the movie, since that’s the business Altman is in.
And we don’t know what kind of deal Johansen struck for that movie. Maybe she does own her likeness in it. We’ll see, I guess.
Except maybe tweeting the name of the movie: https://x.com/sama/status/1790075827666796666
Producer, maybe. But what part of the script did they use for marketing of an unrelated product?
No, I mean referring to the movie Her which features the voice of Johansen as an AI assistant
If the company uses a reference to you to make money, I’d definitely feel entitled to compensation.
So there is something stopping them. The manufacturers.
As an ARM Mac user, I wouldn’t trade all this new battery life for an x86 processor
Are they long, super verbose and often incorrect?
Apple already stopped selling x86 devices and even the stuff that is not under their control seems to work fine
And somewhere in the Terms of Service it says you have to give up your first born child. Or maybe it doesn’t, but nobody will ever know because nobody reads more than is strictly required.
See the comment here: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/14684312