• 0 Posts
  • 67 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2023

help-circle









  • I can’t say I’m familiar with that particular event. But I’m guessing there is a difference there in that iMessage is well, a messaging service. YouTube isn’t, their videos are on public webpages.

    All Freetube and company needs to do, if it comes to it, is find a way extract a video from a public webpage. There’s a million ways to do that.

    iMessage is not a public webpage, and so there is no real way around it unless you go through their api.








  • I’ll need some sources on that one.

    I’m speaking from past experience here. I’ve had conversations with right wingers where I’ve brought up NASA articles about how one of their satellites is tracking climate change. And often times it’s met with “well that’s just want the government wants you to think”, or "that’s from NASA and therefore it’s propaganda.

    On a more personal level, my mother is a lunatic anti-vaxer. She treats the CDC and FDA like they’re straight out of 1984. She always either ignores shit from the CDC/FDA, tries to establish them as liars/frauds, etc.

    I don’t exactly go around saving screenshots of conversations with right wingers, nor do I record arguments with my mother. And none of this lends itself to being easy to track on a search engine (esp given how shitty they are nowadays. That brings us full circle lol).

    So take my word for it or don’t, I don’t care.

    Then this conversation is pointless if you won’t acknowledge the risk of it

    There is risk associated with everything. You can’t have public policy without risk. You can’t have a president without risk. You can’t have a government agency without risk. So what’s your point?




  • but it’s not as bad as if it was run by Trump and co.

    The U.S. isn’t a functioning democracy though, which is why that’s a problem. And just because a nationalized service is controlled democratically doesn’t mean it is controlled by a president. There are a lot of different ways to have democracy.

    And we no longer live in an era of horse and buggy, so democracy can be far more direct than it has in the past.

    In addition, there is already a multitude of positions filled/appointed/approved by the president. The administrator of NASA, the administrator of the EPA, etc. There is nearly 500 federal agencies like this.

    So this would not be a problem unique to a nationalized search engine. So the solution is an actual democratic control of these agencies/administrators, not a wanna be dictator.

    Another thing to keep in mind, what I’m proposing is something that would only ever work in an actual functioning democracy. So therefore I am not proposing this within the U.S.

    Which you didn’t include, is splitting Google up

    As I said, I think it is debatable if a search engine is even critical enough to warrant nationalization. I don’t think the need is there. And as I (admitted retroactively edited my comment to say), I have previously stated that I’m totally cool with breaking up Google at a bare minimum. The rest of this is just about the hypothetical of nationalization.

    Split the advertising from search.

    Short of publicly funding private companies, this would just result in a subscription model, which nobody wants. It’s either ads, subs, or public subsidization.

    This is the surest way to make them cater to us.

    It’s a half measure. The only real way to make them cater to us (aside from previously mentioned nationalization) is regulation, workplace democracy, and so on.

    Even if Google got turned into a small company that only ever does search, they’ll still be a business running under capitalism, with all of the profit seeking motives that got us to where we are now.