I’m not sure:

‘Lynch calmly responded: “There is plenty of money in the country, it’s just a matter of whether you want to get some of it and distribute it more equitably.”’

is classed as “destroys”. It seems like it’s his standard line. The problem here is that the headline doesn’t deliver and the article is basically a soundbite rather than actual reporting on the “why” part of either statement. It’s frustrating that there’s so much of this clickbait “churn” paraded about as news. We need a better informed and educated population of were to avoid more Brexit style nonsense in future.

Apple popularised two things that bug the shit out of me in addition to everything you said. “on iPhone” “on iPad” just sounds utterly wrong. It needs to be “on the iPhone” “on the iPad”. Now everyone is doing it.

The other is " breathlessly we’re excited to announce/we’re excited to share with you/we’re excited!!!big fucking cheesy grin". The whole point of having that whole “excited” or whichever adjective you want at that point of the sentence is to prep you and let you know what you’re supposed to feel. If it’s that good surely you shouldn’t have to tell me what I need to feel.

Oh balls.

Are they being prosecuted or PROSECUTED? I’m not sure there’s a difference but clearly shouting it means there must be.

"How quaint "

Naive/naïve?

I searched for “nahive” just in case it was a word I hadn’t heard of but it doesn’t seem to be.

Shaka-khan, when the beat drops

Look at Dundee for your answers.

You and your random hatred of GDPR are hilarious. To quote you, pop an adder all, you need it.

Ahaha. No.

That’s not strictly true at least of Flamanville and by extension HPC. They were refining the design as they were building Flamanville and kept having to rework whole sections which put a delay on HPC. Now granted there was funding issues and government flip flopping involved but the regulatory process is pretty clear in the UK around these kinds of things.