Has the Starbucks guy actually been confirmed as the same person? It looked like clearly a different jacket and backpack, I assumed that was either an accomplice or just an unfortunate lookalike, but I suppose he could have changed or it could just be odd lighting tricks.
lol @ thinking reddit is anonymous
You could argue that, sure, but their defense of that has already been established and accepted - effectively that the “town square” cannot be liable for the speech of people in it… but if Twitter fully owns all accounts, then the people in the square ARE twitter.
If X owns all of the accounts, then it sounds like they should be liable for all of the speech from those accounts. I hope people jump on this.
Home row is absolutely still taught as the “correct” way to type. Source: kids are in elementary school
If only there was some sort of review process for code to get into the kernel…
AI is really good as a starting point for literally any document, report, or email that you have to write. Put in as detailed of a prompt as you can, describing content, style, and length and cut out 2/3 or more of your work. You’ll need to edit it - somewhat heavily, probably - but it gives you the structure and baseline.
They are free to use whatever license they want, but I am similarly free to avoid using software under non-FOSS licenses.
Crazy doesn’t necessarily mean wrong 🤷♂️ Stallman is undeniably crazy
So then it kinda just sounds like they’re doing things they want to do
Yes, but game engines also hold the entire world inside themselves. There’s no guessing, no estimating, no making sure that what it’s looking at is actually a human or a bush - it already knows that.
The problem with computer vision being lazy is that it can’t ignore something without understanding what it’s looking at, and it can’t understand what it’s looking at without analyzing the data. It’s a circular problem, and will be ridiculously hard to solve - the crux of the issue is that we as people are analyzing that same data, we just don’t realize it.
It’s criminal to let someone do the thing he actively volunteers to do? It’s criminal to use software that someone intentionally puts out into the world as free?
If you’re willing yo do something for free, people are going to let you 🤷♂️
Obviously no one’s going to learn anything if all they do is blatantly asking for an answer and writings.
You should try reading the article instead of just the headline.
You could always try reading the article
An echo chamber of what, exactly? I don’t understand what point you’re trying to make 🤷♂️
The alternative is people rip their families away from their homes that they’ve probably built over the years and move back to their old country.
Musk is very anti-remote-work, so they have to do this anyway. Moving to Texas is only slightly less jarring than moving back to their home country which, in my experience, most people on visas visit regularly anyway.
This will have very little effect on SF in the long-term 😂🤣 All of their staff that was here are going to stay here - they’re not going to follow fucking X to whatever ass-backwards state Musk chooses
So, to recap:
Hell yeah, of course this is a win.
I guess I’m a little confused… why are there duplicates at all? What operation are you performing that ends with duplicates?
Is this drive just where you download them to, and then move them to your organized drive? Why do the books ever touch this drive at all? If there isn’t supposed to be media on the drive, why not just delete the source folder after the organization task is complete?
I hope someone gives you a good answer
I honestly don’t know that there is one. What OP is looking for is effectively an AI librarian… this is literally a full-time job for some people. I’m sure OP doesn’t have quite that many books, but the point remains
Money doesn’t fix trauma, and childhood trauma is rarely fully healed. The kids did nothing wrong, and you should feel bad for them.