obtained with content owner permission.
I mean yeah, technically lol. Lmao even. Perhaps a rofl is in order? Changing the terms of the deal when you have an effective monopoly is a powerful tool when combined with access journalism it seems.
“They found the smart TVs did not appear to upload any screenshots or audio data when streaming from Netflix or other third-party apps, mirroring YouTube content streamed on a separate phone or laptop or when sitting idle. But the smart TVs did upload snapshots when showing broadcasts from the TV antenna or content from an HDMI-connected device.”
The world is owned by a big club, and you’re not in it.
“Guy who was fed a pay-to-win degree at a nepotism practicing school with a silver spoon shares fantasy, to his fan base that own large publications, about replacing hard working and intelligent employees with machines he is unable to comprehend the most basic features of”
So it’s just like a regular researcher then?
Good point. There is a theory somewhere that loosely states one cannot understand the nature of one’s own intelligence. Iirc it’s a philosophical extension of group/set theory, but it’s been a long time since I looked into any of that so the details are a bit fuzzy. I should look into that again.
At least with computers we can mathematically prove their limits and state with high confidence that any intelligence they have is mimicry at best. Look into turing completeness and it’s implications for more detailed answers. Computational limits are still limits.
I think we should still do it, we probably will never understand unless we do it, but we have to accept the possibility that if these synths are indeed sentient then they also deserve the basic rights of intelligent living beings.
That raises a lot of ethical concerns. It is not possible to prove or disprove that these synthetic homunculi controllers are sentient and intelligent beings.
Skill issue.
If you mess up and lose your job as a politician for lying, then you weren’t good enough at weeding out truthfulness to be a politician.
Linux keeps winning by doing nothing.
I didn’t read this, but did you guys know that Zerglings from the game StarCraft: Brood War have a unique upgrade called Adrenal Glands. After applying the upgrade they are colloquially referred to as “Cracklings” because they attack so quickly. This upgrade, only available after evolving a Hive, makes Zerglings extremely effective in the late game, and allows them to swarm enemy units and bases much more effectively. Despite their small size and low health, with this upgrade, Zerglings can become a critical component of the Zerg army, showcasing the game’s strategic depth and the importance of upgrades.
Sounds like you already have a solid plan.
If you have any old laptops or desktops you could convert those instead of using a Pi, but the Pi will work wonders as long as it’s not going to be a 4K TV. Your only real concern here is making sure whatever device you use is able to output video at the TV’s resolution and display hertz.
You’ll probably have more difficulty finding a TV that isn’t a smart TV, than finding a home theater device that is capable of streaming nowadays.
Yes. It’s basically required. Weed helps too, though many experts claim that you don’t need to smoke it and simply touching grass will suffice but idk man. Better to play it safe and just take rips between sips.
Lmao nah. Lemmy is just decentralized censorship. Anyone can ban or block anything else; anyone can start their own community instance and kill it on a whim. Multiple communities have already defederated in the less than a year that I’ve been on here.
Lemmy solves the issue of centralized censorship/echo chamber communities, by replacing them with individual personalized echo chambers that you get to censor yourself. It’s a lot of work to set it up and sustain that type of situation, so it’s not realistic for a rational person that does not have a severe internet addiction to waste their time and effort doing it.
Imagine writing this headline in a universe where daylight exists rofl.
Classical Computers count numbers and do math on numbers. Quantum Computers count collections of numbers and do math on entire collections of numbers.
One is like cooking a full course meal on a single stovetop, the other is doing the same but using an entire restaurant kitchen. The end result is the same meal, but the approach was different. The home chef classic computer has to cook things in the order they were served in, but was able to clean dishes and prepare each step. Problems could be identified and fixed swiftly, buIt took a long time and there were probably a lot of delays between courses so it wasn’t the best meal and a lot of shortcuts and hacks are done to keep things moving.
The restaurant chef does the whole thing all at once and staggers cook timings so everything arrives at the right time. They have no time so they need to carefully plan ahead and set things up, then they have to burn through a shitload of energy making the meal. If anything goes wrong, the whole thing collapses. It may take a higher level of skill to make the meal, but that skill is still founded on the core principles found at home cooking and can even be used at home in a limited manner.
Technically quantum computers can’t do anything new, but the speed boost allows us to do things that are currently impossible. Doing more math at the same time in huge batches is the compututational speed equivalent of breaking the sound barrier.
Intel QA failing to audit third party suppliers properly is Intel’s fault.