They are whining about the fact that an anti-hate organization… browsed twitter. They didn’t hack them. They didn’t do anything scary. They just used the publicly available data to make a report. If that is illegal then simply browsing twitter is also illegal. It’s a public website.

What does that even mean?

Elon Musk bootlickers are the saddest.

Hey, uh… you got any of that evidence man? Some of that actual evidence? The good stuff. The actual evidence? I can’t find any. Can you help me out with that? Just post some. C’mon man.

And if the person running lemm.ee decided they wanted the coveted "mojo’ username for themself you’d be fine with them just taking it?

So you’re saying rare usernames have a monetary value, but also that it’s perfectly fine for a website to steal these rare usernames because the man-child owner of the site has a weird obsession with a certain letter of the alphabet? And how do you know they obtained it via “malicious means” and not that they weren’t just an early adopter of twitter?

The fact that he’s treating twitter like his “personal website” is part of the problem.

Lol, my main email is still yahoo, but it’s over 20 years old and I didn’t know any better at the time. It’s cool though, I know it’s kinda lame.

They should just call them bins. It fits the sites name and works thematically (a bunch of stuff on a similar topic thrown into a storage bin or whatever). Magazine just feels aggressively old fashioned.