Am a developer, please do not pay for any software subscription if you don’t think it’s worth it.

Us devs would love to give the best experience, but if the customer is willing to pay for a shit experience, guess which path management makes you take.

Hi! It’s me, the guy you discussed this with the other day! The guy that said Lemmy is full of AI wet blankets.

Omg you found me in another post. I’m not even mad; I do like how passionate you are about things.

Since there isn’t any room for nuance on the Internet, my comment seemed to ruffle feathers. There are definitely some folks out there that act like ALL AI is worthless and LLMs specifically have no value. I provided a list of use cases that I use pretty frequently where it can add value. (Then folks started picking it apart with strawmen).

What you’re talking about is polarization and yeah, it’s a big issue.

This is a good example, I never did any strawman nor disagree with the fact that it can be useful in some shape or form. I was trying to say its value is much much lower than what people claim to be.

But that’s the issue with polarization, me saying there is much less value can be interpreted as absolute zero, and I apologize for contributing to the polarization.

And then people will complain about that saying it’s almost all hype and no substance.

Then that one tech bro will keep insisting that lemmy is being unfair to AI and there are so many good use cases.

No one is denying the 10% use cases, we just don’t think it’s special or needs extra attention since those use cases already had other possible algorithmic solutions.

Tech bros need to realize, even if there are some use cases for AI, there has not been any revolution, stop trying to make it happen and enjoy your new slightly better tool in silence.

As a software dev, you are my hero!

Of course not, the whole point of disinformation is that it sounds correct, that’s AI’s bread and butter!

On right wing social media, there was tons of posts about this but nothing about the robo taxis.

It’s kind of like know your audience. Right wing people would love to praise Musk, left wing people don’t (for good reason imo).

I’m actually proud of lemmy cause I saw multiple posts for the rocket (as in, it seems to try to cover everything) and many people in the comment pointed out that a lot of great engineers worked on this and this is a human achievement.

I thought that was the whole point of buying Twitter…

Sci-Fi Author: In my book I invented the Torment Nexus as a cautionary tale Tech

Company: At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel Don’t Create The Torment Nexus

Yep, by definition generative AI gets worse the more specific you get. If you need common templates though, it’s almost as good as today’s google.

“Amazon.

We’re evil, and we like it!”

Honestly, it’s one of the more mask off of all the big companies.

Is it weird that I have prime but I pirate still?

It’s just not a good experience…

I agree but I also like to point out that the AI craze started with LLMs and those MLs have been around before OpenAI.

So if openAI never released chat GPT, it wouldn’t have become synonymous with crypto in terms of false promises.

Not only that, image analysis and statistical guesses have always been around and do not need ML to work. It’s just one more tool in the toolbox.

It used to be free, it’s not like the majority of YouTube users voted yes to google takeover.

I’m using lemmy right now and it’s not ad supported and I’m not the product.

It’s always weird to me when people post on lemmy and just assert something that implies lemmy is impossible, bro your using it right now!

I wish they actually committed to that and had drop boxes. It really bothers me how much packaging is used everywhere in every business when it can be avoided.

That’s fine, I’ll just get better at sailing.

Piracy is the only way, clearly capitalism doesn’t give and inch.

Ahhhh, so my ps5 is the most superior PlayStation still, good to know.

For current Americans, future Americans, current humans or future humans?