"Don’t think of it as dying. Think of it as… getting out before the rush. "
"Don’t think of it as dying. Think of it as… getting out before the rush. "
At least he’s honest. Props for that.
I mean he’s dead wrong, but the user name is refreshing.
ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO GOOGLE!!!
In this case I still feel like that’s an improvement.
Lineage/Graphene OS for the win
I’m not saying that is the only good option, but you should look into proton mail.
They’ve never shown me a Joe Rogan podcast.
Or… are we!??
If you don’t mind, what are the specific complaints about Spotify? I’m aware that they’re not terribly profitable for the musicians, but are there other concerns too?
Yeah but this change IS bad.
I have a conspiracy theory that the only reason major browsers have switched to AI is to tactically deny you what you’re really looking for; and keep you on their service, longer.
CTRL+[ YA LUDDITES! /s
In the name of the Beastie, the Tux, and the Holy Gnu!
I almost want that on flags and tee-shirts.
deleted by creator
You bring up an interesting point. My theory is that this is no more than a hopeless election-year shenanigan.
Hey! That porn’s sneaking over the border and stealing their jobs!
Right to Privacy is the first thing to come to mind. It’s worse in that this is not the federal or state government collecting data, it’s a private enterprise. After that, there are frankly glaring Freedom of Speech infringements here, as the definition of obscene content is hand-waved. You can talk academically about making crystal meth on YouTube, but somehow specific content is restricted, not due to the protection of civilians, but due to individual tastes.
None of this falls under the purview of the government of the United States. I’m betting it’s a rather damaging election year shenanigan.
This is blatantly unconstitutional.
Kids! Be my eyes!!!