The way I read the article, the “worth millions” is the sum of the ransom demand.

The funny part is that the exploit is in the “smart” contract, ya know the thing that the blockchain keeps secure by forbidding any updates or patches.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You seem to misstakenly believe that I support this, I don’t, I just argued against a dumb reason as to why it wouldn’t work.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I recomment that you read my earlier comment to read my argument.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            You claim that “governments order companies to do stuff all the time”, but how does that apply to an entry in the blockchain, which we’ve agreed is the authority on who owns property. The hint is: a company couldn’t change an entry in the blockchain, even if the government ordered them to do it.