• SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Unwarranted fear or healthy skepticism? This is the perfect time to “just ask questions.” Firefox is selling itself as a privacy respecting platform and therefore should be held to a higher standard than the garbage that is chrome. If it can pass the test it will be proven again and earn more trust which should result in more users, if it fails then it deserves to be criticised and lose users. Point is if you are selling yourself as privacy respecting you are selling yourself by default as ethical.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      True. According to Mozilla’s own words:

      Principle 4

      Individuals’ security and privacy on the internet are fundamental and must not be treated as optional.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      100% agree. I wasn’t trying to say the collection practice isn’t bad, just that the other linked threads may be taking things a bit farther than what the policy actually says.