• Emi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I thought they made them so small that they would interfere with each other if they made them any smaller.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The article mentions this, and says these new transistors actually take advantage of quantum tunnelling at those small scales to switch the transistors on and off. Usually that’s accomplished by charging up a conductive channel in a traditional MOSFET like a capacitor.

      The disadvantage seems to be that these transistors can only control very tiny currents. They currently lack enough ass to control much else.

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The disadvantage seems to be that these transistors can only control very tiny currents. They currently lack enough ass to control much else.

        Not familiar with this particular paper but transistors are good at acting as switches for higher powered loads so I wonder if these ultra tiny ones can be used to power on slightly less tiny versions which can handle larger circuits.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          That’s basically how IGBTs in power electronics work, in stuff like trains and electric cars. It’s a sensitive, easily activated voltage-driven MOSFET driving a larger BJT transistor in a chain.

          Also how Darlington pairs work. So, yeah, maybe they could do all the computation at that level and then cascade the output through larger transistors to talk to the outside world.