• noodlejetski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    don’t you think they would be much more willing to move?

    no, why would they, if they could talk to Signal anyway?

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Because when you give most people the choice of convenience vs privacy, they’ll choose the thing that they can feel 99 times out of 100(convenience ). Most people don’t care about metadata because first of all they have no idea that’s even a thing, let alone what it does. And they’re not visibly affected by it. The difference between using signal and Whatsapp for the vast majority of people is the fact that one is green and has everyone you know on it and the other is blue and nobody besides me uses it.

      But, if you give signal the convenience of being able to use it with everyone, then the choice becomes “do I wanna use this app that my friend is saying is spying on me or do I wanna use the secure, hacker app?”

      And hopefully, more and more people will switch and we can be rid of fucking meta

    • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      If the user base is signal’s big draw, I’m afraid we’re screwed with such a tiny one against those titans.

      Signal users are far more likely to need to use whatsapp than the other way around, and migrating to signal is a huge loss with not very popular gains. I don’t see how it could compete on a level playing field, but that’s where the opportunity to eliminate signal’s huge disadvantage comes in.