YouTube isn’t happy you’re using ad blockers — and it’s doing something about it::undefined

    • Contend6248@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      111
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      True, holy shit if they wouldn’t completely bomb you with ads everywhere it might change something, but I accidentally used the official app on my smartphone and I can’t even make out content between the ads in the UI.

      Not to speak of the 50s ads for a 20s video, nah won’t ever go back to the official experience.

      It reminds me back when ad blockers came around, nobody cared for the one banner or some pictures on the site, but they ripped your arm out and cried when there were finally solutions for solving that harassment.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m considering giving up Youtube right now with how many times it tries to fuck up my recommendations by sneaking far right BS into my watch history. Especially you, shorts.

  • Tygr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    241
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    YouTube is WHY I have adblockers to this day. I was Ok with the ads at the beginning and end. When they started cramming 2-3 ads in the middle of a 10 minute video, that’s when I started looking for a solution.

    Their greed is why they make $0 from me many years later.

    I think it’s rich they aren’t happy with people using them when they’re the ones that made the standard viewing experience awful in the first place.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      97
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      WON’T SOMEONE THINK OF THE TRILLION DOLLAR SURVEILLANCE CAPITALISM APPARATUS !?!

      • WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        THE DYSTOPIAN 1984 OCEANIA SUPPRESSION SYSTEM THAT CONTROLS THE TRUTH ALONGSIDE THE BIG BROTHER HAS FEELINGS TOO, YOU KNOW ?!?!?

  • Worstdriver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The day I can’t get around youtube ads is the day I stop using youtube. I already refuse to use it on my mobile device or my TV, due to the ads.

      • PeWu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t block it, it doesn’t even download them or even request them. There is no concept of ad in NewPipe.

          • Stephen304@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            1 year ago

            The official newpipe isn’t on the play store because it breaks their terms of service, which makes sense considering 2 of the 3 “newpipes” on there are just completely different apps using the name and logo of newpipe. The third is actually newpipe but with loads of ads added, not sure how long it’ll last before Google nukes it.

            But yeah for newpipe just get the offical ad free and open source version from TeamNewPipe on GitHub or on F-Droid in the main repo. Or if you want newpipe with no ads and also with sponsorblock, you want to get it from polymorphicshade on GitHub or through F-Droid with the Izzyondroid repo.

            • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              On the subject of newpipe, if you also view a lot of videos on NicoNico, Japanese yt, I recommend the pipepipe fork since it allows you to play both yt videos along with videos from NicoNico without ads. Also works with BiliBili in case you like listening to Chinese vocaloid songs or other Chinese content without ads.

    • smiletolerantly@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      YouTube ReVanced gets you completely adfree, configurably de-shittified Youtube with sponsorblock on your phone. (And Youtube Music ReVanced is premium YT music, for free, of course also without ads.)

      And Smarttube Next does the same thing on Android TVs, FireTV, and probably some others I haven’t used.

    • Hopps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      On Android the Firefox app allows the use of extensions including all the adblock options you would find on PC. Works great and for YouTube as well.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Considering how prevalent scams and actively malicious content posing as ads are across ad services in general, having an ad blocker is just basic online safety at this point.

    • realharo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still see fake download button ads distributed via Google’s own ad infrastructure to this day. I even reported a few that were taken down.

      For all the AI prowess Google likes to brag about, why can’t they make a simple “does this look like a download button?” detector? The scams are not that clever, most of them follow one of a small number of specific patterns.

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What’s worse is when corporations try to be funny put a fake download button and the entire ad is like “Wow can’t wait to click this skip button” and they don’t realize that sometimes youtube randomly makes those unskippable so it’s just awkward dead air for 30 seconds.

      • planish@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s it’s own thing.

        The danger of advertising is not that it is able to brainwash you into changing your opinions. The danger is that repeated exposure to inauthentic stories changes your expectations, and plants paying advertisers in your memory.

        This in turn allows your behavior to be controlled, especially in aggregate. You will remember company X sells a thing you want and go buy it, or you will think other people think company Y is environmentally friendly so you will pick them for your vegan barbecue party, or you will have heard of company Z and not automatically skip over their offering in a store. But since it all operates by tampering with your heuristics instead of trying to bowl over your adopted, explicit opinions, it doesn’t trigger any of your protective responses.

        And that’s why you should never view an advertisement.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The thing is YouTube just can’t be nice about it. It just cannot. In times that it was adblocker resistant, they’d add more and longer and worse ads until they pissed off enough engineers who collectively declared it a crisis and built the many anti-YouTube-ad solutions we have, from alternative YouTube mirrors to the Firefox packages.

    We’ve seen this play out in the tech industry multiple times, and always the public wins thanks, largely to programmers who just get ticked off and spend a weekend on pizza to create a bypass.

    The executives at Alphabet know all they have to do is allow concessions to be only mildly annoying and leave them. Five minutes of commercials for fifty minutes of content? That might be fair so long as it’s pizza ads and not Jesus ministries telling us how sinful the LGBT+ are or Matt Walsh suggesting we make it illegal for some folk to vote.

    But they can’t do that. Shareholder Primacy means Alphabet must push for record profits, even if it means enshittifying all their services, including YouTube, and that means a 1/4 ad to content ratio and increasing that until it’s intolerable and ad-based profit numbers go down due to failing viewership.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Five minutes of commercials for fifty minutes of content?

      Yeah, and besides, that shit barely functions on TV/streaming because someone paid to have quality content created. When you’re clicking around yt and you don’t know if a video is decent or dogshit, why should you have to sit through long ads just so you can watch a minute before you decide the content sucks?

      • SeeingWhereThisGoes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is frequently brought up as a problem for twitch as well. On the rare times someone decides to check out a new streamer without many viewers they get ads before the stream and most people aren’t going to sit through that for a streamer of unknown quality so it makes it even harder for new streamers to get discovered.

    • nephs@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you guarantee pizza ads if the jesus ministries are pushing that sweet money around, too?

      Hell, no! The world is happier without the ad industry. The Internet was run basically on pure voluntary effort, and it was great. The ads didn’t make it viable, it always was.

  • Ton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 year ago

    What is even more infuriating, I’m from one of the countries that had YouTube Premium Lite available. €6,99 for adfree YouTube with none of the ‘offline’ or YouTube Music nonsense that I wouldn’t be using anyway.

    My wife and myself have been subscribed for about 6 months now, totally seeing the value of it. Literally one month after signing my mum also onto it, she gets an email telling her that her subscription will end in a month from now.

    Fuck that shit.

    YouTube Premium Lite was perfect, affordable and removed exactly the main issue with YouTube: ads. Endless stupid amounts of ads.

    I’ll go back to Firefox with any amount of extensions that block ads and block the ad-block blockers. Google would have to burn the browser market to the ground before I’ll consider subscribing again.

    • DragonAce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google would have to burn the browser market to the ground before I’ll consider subscribing again.

      They’re sure as fuck trying.

    • Backfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      The irony in this? They have just announced this very subscription plan in Germany. Not even a week after axing the plan in some neighbouring countries.

    • pewnit@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, this is the most sane take I’ve seen about this from the pro adblock side. That’s actually fucked up if they killed it out of nowhere but also sounds like Google.

    • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I won’t ever sub. I’ll find a different hobby/time sink. I won’t ever have to worry about it though, the high seas are always more inventive so there will always be content to watch.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I recommend going to India (VPN) in order to buy premium Together with the family option, you can get to about 1$ a month

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m torn because fuck ads, but also YouTube is probably the most expensive website on earth to run (just the website itself, obviously a shipping company with a website will cost more.) Video is just obscenely expensive to store and they let free accounts upload 4k and keep it private.

    I honestly don’t know the solution here because YouTube being free is amazing, but they’ve literally never made money. I think a business model like nebula is more sustainable, but it sucks for those that can’t afford it.

    (To head off any arguments, I’m pro piracy, I just can’t blame YouTube to trying to stop people)

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the ads weren’t so intrusive I wouldn’t mind nearly as much. As it is, if you don’t block them, you’re watching ads as much as you’re watching content. In-line ads would be better I think, but forcing an ad before the video is annoying as hell.

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        True. Back in 2011 they didn’t bother me at all. I think the issue is once everyone started using ad blockers they had to start squeezing the schmucks that weren’t.

        That and they started allowing unrestricted 4k uploads. That imo is their main issue with money.

        • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I understand where the “everyone using adblockers, makes it worse for those who don’t” argument comes from, and it generally makes sense. But I also have my suspicions that the expectations of infinite growth in publicly traded companies would probably have made it happen, even if nobody used adblockers. That being said, as someone who is giving YouTube money every month to not have ads, there’s a reasonable argument that I’m enabling their bad behavior.

          Fully agree on the 4k uploads thing though, and it also seems to be hurting the bitrate of lower resolutions. Up until around 2021 I primarily watched and preferred 480p when watching on tablets and sometimes even lower on my phone, for me it was a good balance of lower data usage and acceptable image quality. They’ve cut the bitrate so much at the low end though now, that sometimes even on a small phone screen I have to watch at 720p just to keep things from looking like they were recorded off a video conference from the early 2010s. Maybe 720p just is the new 480p and it’s using a similar amount of bandwidth, but it feels like they’re chasing the “bigger number better” crowd, rather than just defaulting to a reasonable resolution, with a high enough bitrate that most people won’t feel the need to adjust it.

    • Longpork_afficianado@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It feels like we should have solved this issue a decade ago with bittorrent.

      A website is just a frontend for a fileserver, so why are we not distributing these files across the globe, where we all volunteer a bit of storage and bandwidth to services we want to use.

      Websites really need be nothing more than indexes and trackers which serve up a list of peers who are hosting the files we want.

      • JW_@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How would the content creators get rewarded in that system? Some of the YouTube ad money goes to the channel the ad is shown on.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s harder to profit from that, so obviously that’s not the direction things went.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Youtube itself might not be making a profit, but I double Google as a whole isn’t by having YouTube. They keep you in their ecosystem longer, and that’s good for them regardless of if you’re watching ads.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because have you ever stumbled upon dead torrents? I see this more as a backup method to relieve the load rather than the only one.

        (Wish I had a perma-online SBC to seed my torrents btw)

    • pewnit@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Another sane take. Seriously, a breath of fresh air after seeing people on both Reddit and Lemmy talking about this with the entitlement of the average r/ChoosingBeggars post

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Meh, YouTube has been profitable for years now despite all the people using adblockers. They aren’t hurting for money anymore. I pay for it but I wish they’d separate out YouTube music from the sub because YTM sucks ass.

    • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      So if they stop people from skipping ads and the people then stop watching altogether, what’s the difference? They’d save on some bandwidth but look less inviting to advertisers since they have less viewers.

      We need a new internet, one free from corporations.

  • nick@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Too fuckin bad for YouTube. I won’t change my behavior, I’ll just not use YouTube.

    Fuck em

      • Resolved3874@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s amazing but I wouldn’t be at all surprised to here that anyone who did got it reversed if not just outright banned from Google. I certainly wouldn’t have tried in on my main Google account.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What happens when google decides to fix this? What happens to the data beyond the free tier? My guess is that it’ll be deleted, and you’d be screwed if you used this as your backup solution.

        E: still a really cool hack!

  • whaleross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been paying the €5 ad free subscription without other premium features for years until they announced that it will be discontinued from next month.

    So then I am going to take a new look into ad blockers.

    Good job, YouTube.

        • JPSound@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, correct! I have to keep bouncing between the two. This time its indeed revanced because the last working version of vanced went down again a couple months ago. And I’m sure in 6 months or so, they’ll start blocking revanced again and by that time github should have a working version of vanced again. I kinda lose track now.

      • CRT 📺@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Make sure you clear all caches and update the filters in uBO, that’s the recommended way to prevent the message from popping up

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    What is it with the number of people “happy” to pay for Youtube Premium? Like “why yes, I’m glad I can give a company that spies on me day and night for the privilege!”

    • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      1 year ago

      What kinda bothers me is that I recognize that something like YouTube is expensive to run and just switching to an alternative isn’t super feasible. I would be more than happy to pay for a service like YouTube that I use everyday. HOWEVER, not with their bullshit double dipping. If I am paying a company like Google to use their services, I don’t think it’s unreasonable that their should be an expectation or mechanism where that means I am not just no longer served ads, but that all tracking and data collection about my account(s) are stopped.

      That’s never going to happen though :/

      • teamevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean like cable that we paid for and got ads or like your cell phone/ISP provider charging you while selling your data simultaneously?

        • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I never said I thought it was tennable or that any system like I described has ever actually existed. Wishes and dreams, ya know?

      • pewnit@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a fair criticism. I personally don’t care about it because I gave up on the idea of having any privacy ages ago but I get that people may not be happy with that.

        If I were to play devil’s advocate, I can say that the data they collect is important for serving you the right videos but let’s be real here, Google definitely uses it to serve you ads everywhere else

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because their “spying” doesn’t really seem to have any down sides for me, and I get better, more useful, products from it. I don’t really care if they know what woodworking videos my boring ass watches.

      • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t just keep track of what videos you watch, they also keep track of what parts of those videos, as well as everything you search for and everything you begin to search for but never actually do. They also keep track of where you are when you watch the video and what device you are watching it on.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Its weird that you are okay with some company doing this.

            When if it was some stalker you’d be freeking out and going to the police and begging for help.

            • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because a stalker might actually cause you physical harm, while Google/YouTube just wants money, and not necessarily your money. I have no love for the ad supported business model, I’m definitely not defending it, but you’re not going to convince someone who doesn’t value privacy to care about it.

              • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                People who don’t value privacy, are always the ones that cry the loudest and say such iconic phrases like “WHO LET THIS HAPPEN” when their privacy inevitably gets violated.

            • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              1 year ago

              Its weird that you are okay with some company doing this. When if it was some stalker you’d be freeking out and going to the police and begging for help.

              ATTENTION STALKERS!!!
              This morning I watched a video of a guy making a 5 drawer cabinet out of plywood on my Pixel 6 XL from my home. I skipped the last 30 seconds of the video because I got bored.

              • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                I get it that marketing doesn’t bother you, but several tech companies have been found to give direct access to users’ data to their employees, who used it in all sorts of creepy ways.

              • float@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                GPS location please.

                Obviously I don’t want to know it but be sure there’s hundreds of Google employees that can freely access it.

              • Gabu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                on my Pixel 6 XL

                Congrats, you’ve already made hacking your phone 10x easier by telling a potential attacker what model you use.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And if you are ever in a spot of trouble, they can and will hand that over to the cops to burn you with. Trouble you dont even need to be guilty of, mind you, so long as the data implies you could be.

            Like how facebook had records of a girl searching for abortion treatments, and slipped those into uncle sams pockets to put her in jail for daring to want the right of bodily autonomy.

            What thing do you do today that will incriminate you tomorrow?

        • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          They don’t just keep track of what videos you watch, they also keep track of what parts of those videos, as well as everything you search for and everything you begin to search for but never actually do. They also keep track of where you are when you watch the video and what device you are watching it on.

          OMG, the horror…

          • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It is for those of us who care about our privacy. I for one don’t want nebulous corporations with questionable ethics and data security policies knowing and tracking my every movement. And while yes, I recognize that to a certain extent that is unavoidable in this day and age, I don’t condone it nor do I want it to be easy for them.

            • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              1 year ago

              People today are just too comfortable with the death of privacy and corporations spying what you do day in and day out.

              Everything about us is up for grabs but god forbid anyone watches a meme without monetization.

          • Gabu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Give me your current location, list of immediate interests and last 100 searched queries, if you’re so okay with that.

            Of course, I don’t expect an obvious corporate shill to have any intellectual honesty.

            • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What are you offering in return? Google gives me what I consider to be valuable services in exchange for that information.

                • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  My reply is consistent with every other comment I’ve made in this thread. Google offers me useful services in exchange for my information. You offer nothing.