yes i did a os one but i am wondering what distros do you guys use and why,for me cachyos its fast,flexible,has aur(I loved how easy installing apps was) without tinkering.

  • Unknown1234_5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tuxedo OS. Same idea as smth like mint or PopOs but (imo) done much better. It also has rolling release for some stuff (like the DE) and non-rolling for other stuff (not even sure what bc I don’t really look in detail). It also uses KDE plasma my favorite (and imo the best) DE. It’s got pretty good app availability in terms of official packages because it is based on Ubuntu LTS (now 24.04). There are a couple things that are vestigial on most computers bc it was made for tuxedo computers but these have no negative effect on other devices in my experience.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Different distros for different uses:

    • Debian with KDE for my casual servers and Docker boxes.
    • Nobara for my main gaming PC.
    • Linux Mint with Cinnamon for my general purpose PCs and my #JustWorks uses.
    • Arch for my pimp mobile test machines.
  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    Alpine:

    • Rolling release (Alpine Edge) yet stable
    • Extremely lightweight
    • Very customizable
    • After setting it up I find that it works very well
    • Decently sized repo
    • OpenRC rather then SystemD (I prefer the way it handles services)
  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I use Ubuntu because it’s the most popular and well-supported.

    I’m going to be switching to Mint at some point because it’s basically a community-run fork of Ubuntu and I don’t trust Canonical anymore, but it’s hard to justify installing my OS from scratch considering I’ve been using Ubuntu since 2017.

    I recently ordered a Thinkpad T14 Gen1 with an R7 4750U, 16GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD and you better believe I’m going to be putting Mint on that as soon as I get it.

  • hollerpixie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Mint. I used to distro hop so much and just got tired of having to reload everything. That was the last one I had done prior to having no more time to switch. 😅 Plus, it just works and it’s easy.

  • Icecreamface@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    I use Debian. The current release has pretty up to date software. It’s super easy to install ( I don’t have as much time to fuck around with my OS as I used to). And it’s stable as fuck.

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fedora.

    I’ve tried them all but found it’s the most reliable. It’s upgrades are even more reliable than Macos and Windows.

    Packages are very up to date but also well tested. Sometimes even newer than Arch for short periods.

    The community is awesome.

    I love Gnome, I’ve found it’s more consistent than even MacOs in its design. And it has perfect keyboard shortcuts.

  • woodgen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Arch.

    Because of pacman. Building and writing packages is simple and dependencies are slim. Also packages are recent. And most likely “there is an AUR package for that”. Also stack transitions arrive early, like pipewire.

    Also let’s not forget Arch Wiki, i bet you have read it as a non Arch user.

    I administer Arch on 8 machines including gaming rigs, home server, web server, kids laptop, wifes gaming desktop, audio workstation and machine learning rig and a bunch of dev laptops. I also use ArchARM on RPi for some home automation.

    Never considered switching since I switched from Ubuntu over 15 years ago.

    I do have experience with several other rpm and apt based distros.

  • Fatur_New@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    I use LMDE. I use it because Mint has proved that it is worth using (for example: it provide easy way to install multimedia codec by only click “Install Multimedia Codec” in applications menu) and I want it to success.

    Sorry if my english is bad

    • TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Fedora Core (the first one) was my first love in Linux. I tried SuSE before that but wasn’t as polished as it is now. That was more than 20 years ago!

  • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Debian. Because it’s the best about “Just Works” (yes, even moreso than Ubuntu, which I tried). It has broken once on me, and that was fixed by rolling back the kernel, then patched within the week.

    BUT I’m also not a “numbers go up” geek. I don’t give a shit about maxing out the benchmarks, and eking every last drop of performance out of the hardware; to me, that’s just a marketing gimmick so people associate dopamine with marginally improved spec numbers (that say nothing about longevity nor reliability).

    If you wanna waste something watching numbers go up, waste time playing cookie clicker, not money creating more e-waste so your Nvidia 4090 can burn through half a kilowatt of power to watch youtube in 8k.

    (/soapbox)

    My gpu is an nvidia 970 and my cpu is a 4th or 5th generation core i7. I just don’t play the latest games anyway, I’m a PatientGamer, and I don’t do multimedia stuff beyond simple meme edits in GIMP.

    It has plenty of power to run VMs, which I do use for my job and hobby, and I do coding as another hobby in NVIM (so I don’t have to deal with the performance penalty of MS Code or other big GUI IDEs).

    It all works fine, but one day I’ll upgrade (still a generation or two behind to get the best deals on used parts) and still not waste a ton of money on AAA games nor bleeding-edge DAWs

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m currently using bazzite due to its really solid out of the box support for gaming hardware and peripherals.

    I’m really surprised everyone uses arch. I have three theories as to why:

    1. There actually aren’t that many arch uses but when arch users have the opportunity they won’t hesitate to say “BTW I use arch” were as others don’t really bother.
    2. There are lots of arch users and everyone uses it because they want to be able to say “BTW I use arch”
    3. (Very unlikly) There are lots of arch users and it’s because it’s actually a good distro that people like.

    (This is mostly a joke jsyk I’m sure arch is a great distro)

    • kureta@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      In my experience, the only quirk of arch is its installation. pacman and the AUR are great and I really did not have any issues with stability. First time I tried arch I used a tiling window manager, custom menu bars and all that “hackerman” stuff, which was not stable at all and forced me to reconfigure and tweak my machine all day every day. Now I am using a full blown Gnome desktop environment and it is rock stable. My only wish is to have an /etc directory just like Intel Clear Linux.

    • osugi_sakae@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Haven’t used it in a few years, but if it is still like it was, I highly recommend it for regular users. Solid, good choice of packages (for regular people). Don’t remember ever having any problems with PCLinuxOS.

      (I switched away only because I’m not a “regular” user.)